I've been thinking, does "Neutral Good" have more moral responsibilities than "Lawful Good"?
For a LG person, you believe the law will serve the good, so when facing a tough decision, you have something to rely on, even to justify your action by it, or if I may, "you can blame it on the law after things went downhill."
For a NG person, a good intention is all you've got, you're on your own, deepdown in your heart, you take full responsibility for the outcomes of your actions. You "can't blame it on anything after things went downhill."
Am I right?
For a LG person, you believe the law will serve the good, so when facing a tough decision, you have something to rely on, even to justify your action by it, or if I may, "you can blame it on the law after things went downhill."
For a NG person, a good intention is all you've got, you're on your own, deepdown in your heart, you take full responsibility for the outcomes of your actions. You "can't blame it on anything after things went downhill."
Am I right?